Your MP’s Question of the Week #8

The Royal Commission of Inquiry into the controversial VK Lingam video clip, headed by chairperson Haidar Mohamed Noor, has submitted a four-volume report to the Yang Di Pertuan Agong at the Istana Negara this morning.

Reliable sources have revealed that the report has probably confirmed the following findings:

1) That the video clip was authentic;

2) That the Indian-looking man talking on the phone was VK Lingam and that the person whom he was talking to on the other end of the line was Ahmad Fairus, the former Chief Justice of Malaysia who retired in 2007 in the midst of the controversies.

In the event that the above findings are true, should the government immediately:

1) Forward the report to the Attorney General’s office for its consideration to institute charges against the culprits highlighted in the video clip for interfering with the administration of justice and subverting the course of justice;

2) Reform the judiciary and compensate all the victims of injustice perpetrated by these personalities; and

3) Set up another Royal Commission to investigate into other serious allegations of improprieties of those retired judges and a sitting judge, which the previous Royal Commission of Inquiry did not allow detailed evidences to be ventilated at its hearing?

– Terjemahan oleh exocet
– Ucapan ribuan terima kasih dari Wee Choo Keong –

Soalan Mingguan WR Anda #8

Suruhanjaya diRaja yang diketuai oleh Haidar Mohamed Noor selaku pengerusi yang menyiasat klip video kontroversi VK Lingam telah mengemukakan laporan 4 jilid kepada Yang Di Pertuan Agong di Istana Negara pagi tadi.

Sumber-sumber yang dipercayai menunjukkan laporan itu mengandungi:

1) Klip video itu adalah sahih dan tulen;

2) Lelaki berbangsa India yang berbual ditelefon itu adalah VK Lingam dan orang yang sedang berbual dengannya ialah Ahmad Fairus, bekas Ketua Hakim Negara yang bersara pada 2007 dan penuh dengan kontroversi.

Sekiranya laporan ini adalah benar, adakah kerajaan patut dengan serta-merta:

1) Memberikan laporan itu kepada Pejabat Pendakwaraya untuk mengambil tindakan tuduhan terhadap mereka yang terlibat dalam klip video itu kerana campur tangan dalam pentadbiran kehakiman;

2) Membuat reformasi dalam badan kehakiman dan membayar pampasan kepada mereka yang menjadi mangsa ketidakadilan oleh pihak yang terlibat dalam klip video ini; dan

3) Menubuhkan satu lagi Suruhanjaya DiRaja untuk menyiasat tuduhan ‘improperties’ terhadap hakim yang telah bersara dan hakim yang masih bekerja kerana Suruhanjaya DiRaja terdahulu tidah membenarkan bukti-bukti ini digunakan dalam laporan mereka?

– 翻译员:angel_x , Wee Choo Keong 致于万二分谢意

阿強每週一問 #8

由 HAIDAR MOHAMMED NOOR 所領導的皇家獨立調查團﹐已經把林甘短片的報告呈交給最高元首。

可靠消息指出報告內容有確定了以下重點﹕

1)短片乃是真的。

2)短片內說電話的印度籍男子就是林甘本人﹐而他通電話的對象是 AHMAD FAIRUS﹐ 2007年在一片爭議下辭職的前馬來西亞大法官。

如果以上屬實﹐當局是否應該﹕

1)把該報告轉交給總檢察署﹐以讓妨害司法公正的罪犯繩之以法﹖

2)即刻改革司法﹐賠償受害人士﹔

3) 再成立一個皇家獨立調查團以調查其他已退休和現任法官﹐因現在的調查團不許詳細證據在聽證會上列出﹖

Share:

Old Blog Stats

5,037,921 hits

New Site Statistics
  • Total visitors : 0

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Can you imagine Elizabeth Ken is the co founder of BXC with the famous operator Emil Rinaldi Sjaiful! The BXC deal with MAHB also involved Tencent - so was Geeko…
The Geeko case was so clear and yet MACC didn’t take actions against Siew Ka Wei & Elizabeth!. We should know why!
MACC should have charged Elizabeth ken and Siew Ka Wei as the evidence published in YB's blog more than enough to show the corruption. Elizabeth Ken was the person signing…
Siew Ka Wei's wife must be proud of him because he has good employment policy when it comes to employing female staff. Heard from the grapevine that sweeties Elly Ken…
Hi jimmy Since the day I lodged the police report against sweeties Elizabeth Ken, there is no development. The police has not recorded a statement from me. I will be…
Archives

Categories

Scroll to Top