Oral Question rejected!

In Parliament this morning one of my Oral Questions submitted on 02 June 2008 for its second sitting was rejected. The said question is numbered No.10 in my list of questions.

10. YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [Wangsa Maju] asks the Minister of Law to state whether the Government intends to order an investigation into the allegation of improprieties of a sitting Court of Appeal Judge, which evidence was tendered before the Royal Commission of Inquiry On Lingam Video Clip. If not, why not.

For a full list of my questions, go here.

– 翻译员:cc liew, Wee Choo Keong 致于万二分谢意

口头问题被驳回

我在2008年6月2日提呈的口头问题今天早上被国会拒绝了。前述的问题是我的问题列表中的第10题:

黄朱强先生【旺沙玛朱】询问司法部长,在林甘短片皇家调查委员会所提呈的证据中声称的上诉庭不当的设立事项,政府是由有意展开调查?如果答案是否定的话,为什么?

Share:

Old Blog Stats

5,037,921 hits

New Site Statistics
  • Total visitors : 895

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Elizabeth Ken is a media specialist of the set up of Siew Ka Wei or ... They used Geeko Tech, then Padu and now Elizabeth tried using the set up…
Who is Elizabeth Ken to Siew Ka Wei? She will somehow appear in business transaction in connection with Siew Ka Wei. Very strange. We can see in Geeko Tech, Padu…
Blocking of a website in a clandestine manner is a form of censorship. It is against freedom of information as guaranteed by our constitution. Dare not file defamation suit and…
criminal defamation! what a joke. Are you Ok Elizabeth? Or Siew Ka Wei did not take good care of you lately?
Con man is scared of his own shadow so using the police to silence people. No success from police. Now using MCMC. We must stand up against violation of freedom…
after reading that YB's blog was blocked by MCMC i came to the blog to see what have been published. I found nothing in the blog that were offensive except…
Archives

Categories

Scroll to Top