Tag: MACC

Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!

On By weechookeongIn wee choo keong7 Comments

Shameless Syed Zaid Albar had resigned and bowed out as chairman of SC in disgrace. Thanks God that today is his last day as chairman of SC.

AirAsia Ordered 400 Aircraft From Airbus

In July 2016 it was an international news in the airlines industry that AirAsia had placed a slew of order for airbuses to the tune of a few hundred from Airbus SE. To be precise, AirAsia ordered an additional 100 Airbus from its existing orders of 300! The then CEO of Airbus, John Leahy, and Tony Fernandes of AirAsia were ebullient on the said orders, HERE. Of course, Tony Ferenandes was then the star of the big airshow in Farnborough and other parts of the world. With such big orders, Tony was the super hero and admired by many in the airline industries throughout the world.

Airbus representatives and Kamaruddin Meranun of AirAsia were on a publicity blitz over the said orders and even had a well publicised signing ceremony held in Kuala Lumpur. At the material time, Tony Fernandes and Kamaruddin Meranun, the supremos of PN17 AirAsia, were the stars which no others airline executives in the world could emulate.

At that material time, little did the world know that the slew of orders for aircraft by AirAsia was a quid pro quo whereby AirAsia’s two criminals known as executives 1 and 2 had been paid been paid more than RM200 million in bribes by Airbus. Please read the UK Crown Court Judgement in “Now Everyone Can Defraud AirAsia Shareholders”.

It is unclear that out of the 400 Airbus ordered, how many have been delivered and how many remained outstanding.

Airbus Had Admitted In The UK Crown Court To Have Paid More Than RM200 Million To Two Criminals Executives 1 & 2 of PN17 AirAsia For Aircraft Orders

In late January 2020 the UK Crown Court had adjudged that two criminals known as executives 1 and 2 of PN 17 AirAsia had received bribes of more than RM200 million from Airbus in exchange of aircraft orders. Airbus had admitted in the UK Court of having paid the said bribes to the said two criminals in PN AirAsia. Airbus was penalised with a fine of £3 billion, HERE.

This Airbus Bribery Scandals were widely publicised internationally and in Malaysia.

If the RM200 million were to be refunded as a discount to AirAsia, the said RM200 million could have been utilised by AirAsia to pay out as dividends to its shareholders. Instead the said two criminal pocketed the RM200 mil as bribes.

The two criminals executives 1 and 2 of PN17 AirAsia had acted against the interest of AirAsia and ultimately its shareholders, which was a matter of great concern to both authorities Bursa Malaysia and SC.

Bursa Malaysia Launched An Investigation Into The Airbus Bribery Scandals But Was Immediately Stopped By SC Under The Watch Of Shameless Syed Zaid Albar

In early February 2020, Bursa Malaysia was the first to announce that it had commenced investigation into the said Airbus bribery scandals and followed by MACC, HERE.

The Security Commission (SC) under the watch of that shameless Syed Zaid Albar, the chairman of Security Commission, had followed suit. However, SC had the audacity to instruct Bursa Malaysia to stop its investigations. At that material time, it appeared to be in order as SC has more powers under the law to investigate and prosecute the said two criminals. Little did we know that it was not what we thought it should be. It was just a scheme to stop Bursa from proceeding with its investigation into the said Airbus bribery scandals.

After More Than 2 Years Shameless Syed Zaid Albar Had Continiued To Play Dumb On The Investigation Of Airbus Bribery Scandals

More than two years have elapsed, there was no sign of SC investigating the said RM200 million Airbus bribery scandals. Despite many calls for this shameless Syed Zaid Albar and/or SC to announce the results of the said investigation, that shameless fella chose to play dumb, a curious habit for a person holding high office. Human decay in this shameless Syed Zaid Albar is extremely noticeable. It is a case of “Harap Pagar, Pagar Makan Padi”!

Out of the blue on 28 April 2022 this shameless Syed Zaid Albar tendered his resignation two and half years prematurely and to take effect today (31 May 2022), HERE.

What a great relief for those upright officers in SC and Malaysia! It is good riddance to bad rubbish!

Datuk Wang Adek Hussin Will Take Over As The New Executive Chairman of SC On 1 June 2022

ef

Left: Datuk Awang Adek Hussin, ex-Senator & Minister of Finance II, Tony Fernandes one of the supremo of PN17 AirAsia.

Datuk Awang Adek Hussin, the former Senator and Minister of Finance II, had been appointed by another Senator Tengku Zafrul, the Finance Minister, who was the former CEO of CIMB and Tune Money Sdn Bhd, which is an outfit of PN17 AirAsia, HERE.

Datuk Awang Adek will take office on 1 June 2022. Lets hope that Datuk Awang Adek has the guts to clean up SC by getting rid of the dead woods or the shameless Syed Zaid Albar’s “kuncu” / cronies for covering up the internationally known Airbus Bribery Scandals which involved the two criminals known as executives 1 and 2 of PN17 AirAsia who had been paid more than RM200 million bribes by Airbus.

Stay Tuned

Now Everyone Can Defraud Shareholders Of AAX

On By weechookeongIn wee choo keong2 Comments

Left: Tony Fernandes Rt: Kamaruddin Meranun. The top executive of AirAsia Group and AirAsia X. Lets see whether they will issue another statement on this scandal in connection with the 2017 RR case.

Updates on 7-2-2020 @ 5:30 pm:   PMO has clarified that the press reports of what YAB Dr Mahathir Mohamed had said about the Airbus had bribed the AirAsia executive 1 and 2 are inaccurate. What the PM had said was:  “If payment goes to the individuals then it is a bribe”.  If the benefits goes to the individual it is also bribe. Please read HERE.

Updates on 6-2-2020 @11:30 pm: Sri Lanka arrest its former airline chief executive Chandrasena and his wife over the Airbus bribery scandal exposed in the Judgment of the UK Crown Court on 31-1-2020.  In the same Judgement the evidence is crystal clear that Airbus had paid bribe of RM204 million to two AirAsia executives 1 & 2, HERE.

The Statement of Facts and Approved Judgment in the case of Serious Fraud Office UK vs Rolls Royce Energy System Inc (RR) dated 17 January 2017 provides a clear insight into the modus operandi of the top executives and/or senior officers in AirAsia Group and AirAsia X internationally.  It was all about personal enrichment at the expense of the rakyat (investing public).

With their track records in this RR case and the recent Airbus bribery scandal, one will not be very wrong to suspect they had been and still are operating with the same or similar modus operandi in Malaysia or other countries.  Can our past and present Ministers and/or top officials in the enforcement agencies like Security Commission, Bursa Kuala Lumpur and others speak up on these “uncovered” corrupt practices?  Of course, their motto is “silence is golden” at this difficult time for their “friends”. These top executives of AirAsia Group and AAX referred to in the said two cases of RR and Airbus have brought Malaysia into disrepute internationally.

Let see what actions the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Sport & Youth (on the chairman of Stadium Board) under “Malaysia Baru” are going to take or for how long both are going to play dumb in the light of the findings of bribery or corrupt practices in connection with the top executives of AirAsia Group and AirAsia X.

For background articles please read, HERE, HERE, HERE & HERE.

The 2017 RR Case in UK

The RR case was about the top executive or senior of AirAsia Group who in 2011 wanted to buy a PRIVATE JET and was devising a scheme for the maintenance cost of the said private jet to be paid through the account of AirAsia X with RR. The private jet was finally bought in late 2011. There were more than sufficient evidence found in the said RR case on how blatant was the modus operandi of the said executive and/or senior officers of AirAsia Group and AirAsia X in securing the free maintenance for the AirAsia Group executive’s personal jet at the expense of the shareholders of AirAsia X!

The Judgement  & Statement Of Facts On The RR Scandal

They AirAsia Group executive and AirAsia X senior executive were specifically referred to in the Judgement of the Learned Honourable Justice Sir Brian Leveson, the President of the UK Queen’s Bench Division (court) in UK.  The Statement of Facts comprised  of 52 pages. This bribery or corrupt practice case was investigated by SFO and Department of Justice USA (DOJ).

The said Rolls Royce’s bribery / corrupt practice case also happened in Indonesia (Garuda), Thailand (Thai Airways), India (Defence),  Russia, Indonesia (Energy), Nigeria (Energy), Indonesia (Civil), China and of course, Malaysia (AirAsia & AirAsia X) can not be left out.

In the said Statement of Facts of the UK Crown Court, there were three important personalities from AirAsia Group and AirAsia X, They were referred to as:  

“AirAsia Group (AAG) executive”

“AAX executive”

 “AAX senior employee”

Count 12 Of The Statement Of Facts (AirAsia & AirAsia X)

Summary of Count 12:

RR Failure to Prevent Bribery between 1 July 2011 and 30 November 2013.

RR failed to prevent its employees from providing an Air Asia Group (“AAG”) executive (“the AAG executive”) with credits worth US $3.2 million to be used to pay for the maintenance of a private jet despite those employees believing that, in consequence, the AAG executive intended to perform a relevant function improperly. This financial advantage was given at the request of the AAG executive, in return for his showing favour towards RR in the purchase of products and services provided by RR and its subsidiaries, including TCA services to be supplied to Air Asia X (“AAX”), a subsidiary of AAG.”   (see page 48 – 49 para 314 below – the Statement of Facts)

In a nutshell, in August  2011 “AirAsia X senior employee“  had approached RR for information about RR’s engine maintenance programe in respect of a private jet which AAG executive was planning to purchase.

In November 2011 RR senior employee met AAG executive. RR senior employee reported to RR other employees that AAG executive was offended because of  the Corporate Care rate had offered on the new Global (private jet) that the AAG executive had just bought.  (see para 316 below).

This AAG executive was loaded with cash to be able to buy a private jet.

There was an internal email sated:

On the corporate jet, not good news it’s a syndicate of private Malaysian investors. So working a trick between deals is a non starter. I’ll check with legal though.” (see para 318 below)

RR compliance provided the following advice:

“As discussed, the expectations of the [AAG executive] need to be tempered.
RR cannot give preferential rates on Corporate Care for the [AAG executive’s] personal aircraft  just because of the business done with RR by the Airline of which he is [an executive]. The two should not be linked as there are both legal and ethical implications to doing so.
Let me know if you require the extracts from both the FCPA and UKBA that underpin this.” (see para 319 below)

Please see para 326 – 330 below where many discussions on how to flout the law on compliance and other laws by creative accounting and concealment of the Total Care Agreement (TCA).

When RR employee pursued prompt payment of debts by AAX which upset AAX senior employee who later requested the removal of this RR employee. (see para 333 below).   Of course, this RR employee was later removed!

On 15 March 2013 this RR employee emailed one of his senior employee that “AAX senior employee wants a cash settlement that is off record and not visible to the AAX group“. (see para 334 below)

He later explained to his RR senior employee that what the AAX senior employee was seeking was an “unlawful cash payment for [AAG executive]’s private jet.”  (see para 335 below)

Were The Shareholders Of AirAsia X Bhd Been Defrauded?

Below are the relevant pages for paragraphs 312 to 349 of the Statement of Facts for all to read and judge whether this was a case of AirAisa Group executive and/or AirAsia X senior employee had defrauded the shareholders of AirAsia X  Bhd.

It is most surprising that in 2017 this serious case between SFO vs Rolls Royce was not highlighted by the local media.  It is equally shocking that our Security Commission (SC) was oblivious about the Approved Judgment and evidence as stated in the Statement of Facts below.

Security Commission / Bursa KL To Investigate

Perhaps this might be an opportune moment to ask Security Commission ( SC) and Bursa Kuala Lumpur why they were not aware about this matter and if they were aware then why no actions taken against the culprits in AirAsia Group and AirAsia X as shown in the said Statement of Facts.

Or did the then SC chairman / top officials classified this serious matter under NFA (no Further Action) in 2017? 

Was this a case of “HARAPKAN PAGAR, PAGAR MAKAN PAD”?

No wonder Kamarudin Meranun of AirAsia was let off very lightly with a settlement of only RM3.64 million for insider trading during the MAS – AirAsia Share SUAP, HERE.  SC is a laughing stock.

MACC Should Investigate Into The Then Decision Makers In SC and Bursa KL

MACC should also investigate into why there was no actions taken or the case was classified under NFA by then SC chairman or top officials and/or Bursa Kuala Lumpur on such a serious violations of our security law i.e. defrauding the shareholders of a public listed company.

SC / Bursa KL and MACC To Investigate On The Status Of The  Private Jet

All the three enforcement agencies namely SC, Bursa Kuala Lumpur and MACC should also investigate what is the status of this private jet that was owned buy the AirAsia Group executive, AirAsia Group 2nd executive and another individual (the evidence in the RR case) and whether this private jet was later sold to company related to AirAsia Group.

                                        Statement of Facts

Statement of Facts – page 48

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Statement of Facts – page 49

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Statement of Facts – page 50

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Statement of Facts – page 51

________________________________________________________________________________________

Statement of Facts – page 52

________________________________________________________________________________________

Statement of Facts – paGE 53

__________________________________________________________________________________________

You can read the full Judgment by Sir Brian Laveson – Regina v Rolls Royce, Statement of Facts and Deferred Prosecution Agreement, which have been published in the website of Serious Fraud Office UK, HERE.

MACC & Security Commission Are Investigating Into The Airbus Bribery Scandal of Two Directors of AirAsia!

On By weechookeongIn wee choo keong3 Comments

MACC Chief, Ms Latheefa Koya, who was a practising lawyer.

Yesterday yours truly had posted an article about the bribery scandal involving two AirAsia and AirAsia X executives, HERE.  After several hours of the UK Crown Judgment / Verdict dated 31.1.2020 about the two directors of AirAsia were found to have received bribe of of US$50 million (RM204 million) from Airbus had gone viral, the MACC Chief Ms Latheefa Koya acted expeditiously and announced that MACC was in contact with the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) of UK, HERE.

She should be applauded for taking swift actions in public interest on the said bribery scandal involving the two directors of AirAsia.

Ms Latheefa Koya was right to state in her press statement that:

“Under the MACC Act, we are empowered, and have jurisdiction, to investigate any act of corruption committed by any Malaysian citizen or permanent resident in any place outside Malaysia.”

The AirAsia bribery scandal is not a difficult case for MACC. From a legal stand point, the SFO of UK must already have more than sufficient evidence to prosecute Airbus for bribery based on the evidence it had gathered. Hence, in the light of the evidence,  Airbus was compelled to propose a settlement in order to defer prosecution pending approval from the Crown Court in UK. If Airbus did not enter into the settlement then it will be prosecuted for bribery and etc.

According to to the said Judgment / Verdict the SFO even possessed email correspondence from a director of AirAsia demanding furhter payment of US$4 million. The said email also mentioned that US$16 million had been owed to me for ages when I bought the first 60 aircrafts.

Yesterday yours truly called upon MACC, SC and Burtsa KL to act on the damning evidence exposed in the said Judgment / Verdict of the said Crown Court.

Transparency International Called Upon SC To Act On The Bribery Scandal

This morning Transparency International called upon SC to investigate into the Airbus having paid a bribe of US$50 mil to AirAsia Executive 1 and AirAsias Executive 2 as stated in the said Judgment / Verdict,  HERE.

Securities Commission Malaysia Chairman Datuk Syed Zaid Albar

SC has issued a press statement this morning that it will also  investigate into the said bribery scandal.

“The statement of facts in the case of Regina vs Airbus SE discloses several allegations against AirAsia Group Bhd and AirAsia X Bhd.

“As both are listed on Bursa Malaysia, the Securities Commission Malaysia will examine the allegations and review all available evidence to determine if there is any breach of securities laws,” SC chairman Datuk Syed Zaid Albar said in a statement, HERE.

Yours truly believes that this coming days Bursa KL will also commence its investigation into this bribery scandal.

The Spin Doctors For AirAsia

The spin doctors AirAsia was in great pain in trying to spin out of the very tight corner. But it was a miserable poor attempt, HERE.

It must be noted that in the said Judgment / Verdict Airbus had admitted to have bribed the two top brass of AirAsia and AirAsia X.  The press statement by AirAsia did not touch one single bit about the Agreed Facts in the Judgment / Verdict of the UK Crown Court that Airbus had paid US$50 million (RM204 million) to AirAsia Executive 1 and AirAsia Executive 2!

However, it was very glaring that the spin doctors in AirAsia did not dare to spin on the US$50 million (RM204 million) bribe paid to and received by AirAsia Executive 1 and AirAsian Executive 2.  Why?  It must be that AirAsia knew too well that two of directors in AirAsia had received the RM204 million bribe from Airbus.

We can only feel sorry for the spin doctors in AirAsia was caught in the mess created by the two top brass in AirAsia and AirAsia X.

It is an open and shut case. It will not be too long that the two culprits in AirAsia will be dragged to the Court to be charged with receiving bribe and/or money laundering. Now that SC is also investigating the bribery scandal.

It Is Almost Impossible For AG to NFA The Bribery Scandal

On 9-1-2019 we witnessed the arrest and detention of Dato’ Dr Siew Ka Wei and Elizabeth Ken, the CEO of Geeko Tech Sdn Bhd and media specialist of Redberry Media group, which is an outfit of Siew ka Wei.

It will be almost impossible for AG to NFA (No Further Action) this matter like the scandal costing Tourism Malaysia RM100 million, which involved Dato’ Siew Ka Wei, the executive chairman of Ancom Bhd, and the Redberry Media Specialist, Ms Elizabeth Ken, HERE & HERE.     But we will never know.

Lets sit back and wait for the interesting movie on the Airbus bribery scandal to develop.

PADU’s RM62 mil – Now You See, Now You Don’t!

On By weechookeongIn wee choo keong8 Comments

 

En Mohamad Azhan Bin Md. Amir a.k.a. the “brainless Hebat One”, TKSU (Pengurusan) of MOE.

Updates at 1:30 pm on 20-11-2019:  The “brainless Hebat One” has been true to form. On 11-11-2019 he chaired the JK Pemandu to discuss the MOE’s damning chief accountant report, which had stated that the PADU’s account was grossly overstated by more than RM62 million, and decided that JK Siasatan MOE to investigate on the PADU’s creative accounting.  The “brainless Hebat One” being brainless chose to avoid taking positive actions to protect the interest of the rakyat by lodging report with the police, MACC and/or Ketua Audit Negara. He is just playing for time in the hope that all the wrong doings in PADU will be swept under the carpet later.  With so many adverse findings on PADU’s accounts, the brainless is playing dumb by calling for meetings after meetings and investigations after investigations.  It would appear that the brainless was on a covering up spree. The brainless must take responsibility for this scandalous RM340 million failed tablet project as it is under the control of JK Pemandu of which he is the Chairman. 

 

Rumour was flying around in the Ministry of Education (MOE) that PADU Corporation (PADU) is a colossal can of worms.  It has now transpired that the Chief Accountant of MOE’s Account Department has recently informed Encik Mohammad Azhan Bin Md Amir a.k.a.the  “brainless Hebat One”, the Timbalan Ketua Setiausaha (Pengurusan) of MOE that the Account Department of MOE has been instructed to provide a report on 16 September 2019, it was unable to do so because insufficient supporting documents and information from PADU.

PADU’s Accounts Overstated By More Than RM62 million!

Tuan Hj Nasran Bin Omar C.A. (M), the Chief Accountant of MOE, had discovered that the PADU’s account was OVERSTATED (“TERLEBIH NYATA”) by RM62,386,834.77!.  What a fantastic creative accounting in PADU.  It must be due to the genius in PADU at work that out of nowhere PADU has a balance of more than RM62 million on paper.  Rumour has it that on or about 18 October 2019 the said Chief Accountant of MOE has given his recommendation that a detail forensic audit of PADU should be done by MOE’s Account Department or Jabatan Audit Negara in order to get to the bottom of the serious discrepancies.

Yours truly suggests that the authority or Jabatan Ketua Audit Negara should also do a full forensic audit on PADU’s 2016 – 2018 Audited Accounts because there were too many creative accountings performed during the height of the scandalous tablet project worth RM340 millions of Rakyat money.

The infamous “Creative’ Financial Officer of PADU, En Ahmad Izzat Bin Ahmad Zaki. One of the main players in facilitating all the payments to the special purpose bank account known “Utusan Epiweb Collection Account” for the scandalous RM340 million tablet project

Only in PADU and/or MOE that its account has an overstated balance of more than RM62 million, due to the special talent of PADU’s Chief Financial Officer, En Ahmad Izzat Bin Ahmad Zaki and his deputy.

Now that “the brainless Hebat One” had been formally informed about the creative accountings of PADU and the financial scandal in PADU/MOE on the failed tablet project worth RM340 million, he is duty bound to lodge a formal report with the police, MACC and the Ketua Audit Negara.  Being brainless the Hebat One, it will not put pass him that he will chair more meetings with no solution to the creative accounting in PADU in order to hide his incompetence.

JK Pemandu Of MOE To Meet Again On 11 November 2019 – For Fun?

Let’s see after the scheduled JK Pemandu meeting on 11 November 2019, whether the “brainless Hebat One” will think like a responsible civil servant and opt to do the right thing for a change by lodging a report with the police and/or MACC and/or Ketua Audit Negara pertaining to all the wrong doings including the creative accountings in PADU/MOE or conduct business as usual or to lodge another report concerning the leakage on “the now established fact” ( Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6,Part 7, Part 8 and Part 9) of the findings of the said Chief Accountant of MOE about the OVERSTATED (“TERLEBIH NYATA”) of more than RM62 million in PADU’s accounts.  Most probably the “brainless Hebat One” will fix many more JK Pemandu/”Shiok Sendiri” meetings with no solution.

Knowing the mentality of the “brainless Hebat One” he will do thoughtless things like lodging another report on the leakage of the rumour about the PADU’s account being overstated by more than RM62 million in his miserable attempt to cover up all the financial scandals involving the failed tablet project worth RM340 million.

Malaysia Baru

In Malaysia BARU the mantra of the civil servants should be to help the new administration to use the American metaphor to drain-the-swamp and create an eco-system unfriendly to corruption, abuse of power, mismanagement and rent seeking. Business cannot be as usual, whistle blowing and a free press and all it encompasses should be protected even celebrated not criminalised to hide wrong doings and snafus in the advancement of the truth and the common good.

Now We Need A Civil Service Act

The Ketua Setiausaha Negara (KSN) should take note in the appointments of KSUs and TKSUs and make sure that the Ketua Pengarah Perkhidmatan Awam (KPPA) and the new Pengarah INTAN (Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara) gets the message and in turn creates a better training process for senior civil servants lest they turn out like the “brainless Hebat One” who deserved to be immediately pooled. It is time for Parliament to enact the Civil Service Act to ensure accountability and transparency in how the civil service works. There is the Education Act 1996, Police Act 1967, Armed Forces Act 1972 but no Civil Service Act. Unbridled power will only lead the spiral back of the bad old days.

Supremely Feckless & Brainless MOE Officer!

On By weechookeongIn wee choo keong5 Comments

 

En Mohamad Azhan Bin Md Amir, TKSU (Pengurusan) of Ministry of Education. He is also known as the “Brainless Hebat One”. 

Here’s a case of a public servant so insulated by power and privilege in high office that he ridiculously delves into a state of stupidity.

The Deputy Secretary General (Administration) of the Ministry of Education (MOE), En Mohamad Azhan bin Md Amir a.k.a ‘Brainless Hebat One’, has chosen to lodge a police report against yours truly instead of tracking the perpetrators involved in the failed RM340 million computer tablet project for teachers nationwide.

He saw it fit to make the police report against yours truly on 26 September 2019 for disclosing information/minutes of JK Pemandu of an MOE meeting on 18 July 2019.

Information gleaned from the minutes was integral to “MCMC Fund Looted – Shady ‘Speedy Gonzales’ Deal Resurfaces – Part 10 (PADU Spent Without Authority)”.

PADU, a company incorporated by guarantee under the purview of MOE, was tasked with managing the supply of 430,000 computer tablets with pre-installed Tutor Guru app and Utusan Malaysia e-paper to teachers by June 2018. It is a case of “Harapkan pagar, pagar makan padi!”.

The funds were granted by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to PADU during the Najib’s Administration.

On 10 October 2019, Inspector Hasbullah of Putrajaya police recorded a statement from yours truly over the posting of my 10th article, HERE.  The minutes of meeting in question was in this article.

For the back ground of this huge scandal, please read Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8 and Part 9.

Yours truly was informed the matter is being investigated because of the so-called confidential information and documents in connection with the scandalous RM340 million tablet project were posted in this blog.

It appears the police are more interested in wanting to know who supplied yours truly the minutes of the meeting and other information about the wrong doings in PADU/MOE and not the wrong doings itself.

Yours truly spent one hour to give a statement and told the Inspector that certain documents including the JK Pemandu minutes were sent to my law office by an unknown person several months ago.

Yours truly told the officer that I decided to publish the 10 articles pertaining the scandal after weeks of document verification.

Was the ‘Brainless Hebat One’ in a state of “kera kena sambal belacan” that forced him to scare yours truly with police action?

Only the brainless would think of such a stupid tactic of lodging a police report to cover up the appalling wrong doings with regards to the RM340 million failed tablet project in PADU and MOE.

In the minutes in question, the ‘Brainless Hebat One’ had openly proclaimed that “urus setia mendapati setiap laporan tersebut yang dikemukakan sama ada tidak konsisten, mempunyai ralat dan perincian item yang tidak dapat ditentukan punca kuasanya.”  Why up to this date there is no report lodged by MOE to the police and MACC?

During the JK Pemandu meeting of 18-9-2019, the ‘Brainless Hebat One’ knew very well that PADU is full of financial scandal and a national wastage, but that more importantly a big can of worms had to be opened to save public funds.

The ‘Brainless Hebat One’ chaired several JK Pemandu meetings, expressing reservations after reservations about the wrong doings in PADU.

Instead of taking positive action like lodging reports over the misdeeds with police, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and other authorities, the ‘Brainless Hebat One’ had the audacity to lodge a police report against yours truly for exposing the scandal.

Before the ‘Brainless Hebat One’ lodged the said police report, yours truly thought that the failed tablet scandal was confined to the little napoleons in PADU only.  Now it seems that several high-ranking officers in MOE were also involved. It was all about the relationship of “Abang – Adik”.

Still, after a series of 10 articles in yours truly’s blog, which was read by top officers in MOE and PADU, not a single officer in PADU or MOE has came out to refute any of the 10 articles.  They could only  played dumb or brainless.  The high ranking officers in MOE / PADU had done nothing positive to protect public interest and funds from MCMC. The only positive thing that this brainless “Hebat One” has done was to lodge a police report against yours truly for exposing the RM340 million worth of tablet scandal.

Is the ‘Brainless Hebat One’ trying to cover up the dishonesty in PADU and MOE by lodging the police report against yours truly with the predominant aim to save the culprits? I believe so.  Did the brainless “Hebat One” get the approval from the Minister to lodge the said police report?

Bring it on, ‘Brainless Hebat One’.  Yours truly is waiting for you to lodge more reports.