Questions for October 2010 Parliament Session

Soalan-Soalan untuk Jawapan Lisan
Questions for Oral Answers

1. Tuan Wee Choo Keong [ Wangsa Maju ] minta Perdana Menteri menyatakan apa tindakan yang di ambil untuk memperbaiki perbezaan yang amat ketara bayaran gaji dan elaun bagi pegawai negeri kakitangan awam dalam perjanjian Ceupacs berkesan pada tahun 2007 menyebabkan pengawai rendah dibayar lebih tinggi daripada pegawai atasan menyebabkan kegusaran, tidak puasan hati dan pengurangan effisiensi perkhidmatan.

Tuan Wee Choo Keong [ Wangsa Maju ] asks the Prime Minister to state what actions were taken to rectify gross discrepancies of salary and allowance payments to civil servants in Ceupacs agreement effective in 2007 resulting in junior officers being paid higher than their seniors causing great resentment, disincentive and inefficiency.

2. Tuan Wee Choo Keong [ Wangsa Maju ] minta Perdana Menteri menyatakan apa langkah telah di ambil untuk menghentikan perkauman dan sifat anti-nasionalis dari usaha mengugat kestabilan negara, dan apa tindakan yang harus di ambil dalam kerangka sediada untuk mencapai tujuan maksud dan memenuhi objektif program 1Malaysia.

Tuan Wee Choo Keong [ Wangsa Maju ] asks the Prime Minister to state what measures have been taken to stop racism and anti-nationalists from destabilizing the country, and what actions to be taken in order to achieve the objective of 1Malaysia program.

3. Tuan Wee Choo Keong [ Wangsa Maju ] minta Menteri Dalam Negeri menyatakan apa tindakan yang di ambil untuk menyiasat laporan polis yang di buat keatas EXCO Selangor YB Ronnie Liu atas dakwaan pemalsuan tandatangannya dalam skandal Surat Sokongan, sehingga Lee Kee Hiong, bapa saudara beliau Lee Wye Wing dan syarikat WSK Services antara nama yang di ketengahkan.

Tuan Wee Choo Keong [ Wangsa Maju ] asks the Minister of Home Affairs to state what actions were taken to investigate the police report lodged by Selangor Exco member YB Ronnie Liu alleging forgery of his signature in the Letters of Support scandal, resulting in the names of Lee Kee Hiong and her uncle, Lee Wye Wing, and WSK Services being highlighted. Continue reading “Questions for October 2010 Parliament Session”

“Battle” over Parkway needless and wasteful for ‘original sin’ committed by authorities tasked to safeguard our national interests

UPDATE, 31 July 2010: Khazanah buy-back 23.9% Parkway block cost rakyat a whopping RM935 million! Click here for story.
The government should immediately launch an investigation into the fiasco!
———————————————

I am not at all amused over the fight for control of Parkway Holdings Ltd (Parkway) between Khazanah Nasional Berhad (Khazanah) and Fortis Healthcare Ltd of India, which harbors a “vision to become a global healthcare provider.” You can read the full report by the Star here.

Let me remind all and sundry, that at the core of this “battle” lies the sweet fruit called Pantai Hospital that has been wickedly plucked and eaten by an outsider supposedly under the watchful eyes of the caretakers of our national garden.

The bitter fruits of this dereliction of duty on our part were manifolds. First, there was the unwholesome and ill-gotten gains by a few through blatant abuse of power and probable collusion by interested parties. Then there was the breach of our national security because of the ultra-sensitive database falling into foreign hands. Followed by the needless and sinfully high cost expended to buy-back our shares that were originally squandered willy nilly. Let us not factor in the derision of our national pride as the enemy would have had scoffed at our idiocy while laughing all the way to the bank – for no price can ever redeem our national shame suffered. Continue reading ““Battle” over Parkway needless and wasteful for ‘original sin’ committed by authorities tasked to safeguard our national interests”

Teks ucapan semasa membahas Rang Undang-Undang untuk meminda Akta Antipemerdagangan Orang 2007 (Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act 2007), 15hb Julai 2010

Anti-trafficking of Persons! Anti-trafficking of National Assets!

Tuan Yang Di-Pertua,

Saya bangun untuk membahas “Rang Undang-Undang untuk meminda Akta Antipemerdagangan Orang 2007 (Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act 2007),” dengan mengalu-alukan cadangan pindaan.

Tetapi Kerajaan perlu merujuk kepada Laporan “UN High Commissioner for High Commissioner for Human Rights to Economic & Social Council” bertarikh 20 Mei 2002. Iaitu:

            The Primacy of Human Rights:

1.   The human rights of trafficked persons shall be at the centre of all efforts to prevent and combat trafficking and to protect, assist and provide redress to victims. 

2.   States have a responsibility under international law to act with due diligence to prevent trafficking, to investigate and prosecute traffickers and to assist and protect trafficked persons.

3.   Anti-trafficking measures shall not adversely affect the human rights and dignity of persons, in particular the rights of those who have been trafficked, and of migrants, internally displaced persons, refugees and asylum-seekers.

  Continue reading “Teks ucapan semasa membahas Rang Undang-Undang untuk meminda Akta Antipemerdagangan Orang 2007 (Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act 2007), 15hb Julai 2010”