Skip to content
Menu
Wee Choo Keong
  • Home
  • Discussion
  • Parliament
  • About Me
  • Complaints for DBKL
  • Festive Wishes
Wee Choo Keong

Thump Up To MAVCOM To Protect Travelers On Refund of PSC

Posted on March 19, 2018
In December 2011 AirAsia was campaigning against the increased of PSC by MAHB. What a noble act!

It is an open secret that airlines have forfeited the Passenger Service Charge (PSC) or Airport Tax of no-show passengers and treated the unclaimed Passenger Service Charge or Airport Tax as part its revenue. This is definitely no right under law.

For no-show passengers, airlines are only entitled to forfeit the actual fare paid by the passengers and it is duty bound to refund PSC collected to the no-show passenger. At all material times the PSC of no-show passenger belong to the passenger. Airlines have no legal right to the PSC of no-show passengers.

Yours truly is glad to learn that MAVCOM had announced that it will seek to amend the provisions of  Malaysian Aviation Consumer Protection Code 2016 (MACPC) in its bid to protect travelers.  Please see below for the press release of MAVCOM. The traveling public should applaud MAVCOM for this initiative.

This is the move into the right direction. MAVCOM should act as soon as possible as the traveling public need the protection urgently.

On 23 November 2011 yours truly had tabled a question to the Minister of Transport and he had confirmed that from 1 May 2002 to August 2011 AIrAsia Bhd  had collected RM6,432,697.00 from no-show passengers and from November 2007 until September 2011 AirAsia X had collected RM498,000.00.  The Minister had also said that the PSC for no-show passengers should be refunded to the passenger. The unclaimed PSC for the no-show passengers should be handed over to MAHB, who will handover to the Registrar of Unclaimed Money Act.  For the full reply please read HERE.

It has been confirmed by Mr Shin Kok Leong,  the AirAsia Group Financial Accountant,  in the hearing of the defamation suit filed by AirAsia Bhd against yours truly that after 6 months if the no-show passengers did not claim it, AirAsia shall treat the said PSC as its revenue.  The said Defamation Suit was dismissed with cost RM50,000.00 by the High Court in HERE & HERE.

MAVCOM

It has been confirmed by MAVCOM that some airlines have been found to have levied administrative charges for claiming back PSC ranging from RM15 to RM300!  What a prohibitive figure. It is about time that MAVCOM should act against this daylight robbery.

(The Star) Mavcom seeks further protection for travelers

PETALING JAYA: Airlines will be required to remit refunds due to air passengers within 30 days from the date of the request by travelers, and can no longer charge fees for rendering special assistance to passengers.

Travelers are also entitled to a full refund of the passenger service charge (PSC) if they do not proceed with their journey, and airlines will no longer be allowed to impose any fee to facilitate the refunds.

Not all airlines currently refund the unused PSC portion to passengers, some of whom do not know that they have the right to that monies. There are airlines that pocket the fees that amount to RM50mil-RM60mil a year.

The industry regulator, the Malaysian Aviation Commission (Mavcom), is seeking to amend and add some new provisions to the Malaysian Aviation Consumer Protection Code 2016 (MACPC) in its bid to protect travelers.

It has posted a consultation paper on the matter on its website and hopes for feedback from the public before March 22.

The commission said some airlines have been charging consumers between RM15 and RM300 for processing PSC refunds, which could be more than the prescribed PSC rate.

Mavcom said airlines would be prohibited from charging any fee for rendering special assistance to any passenger with a disability or requires special assistance as long as they can provide the necessary documents.

It is also proposing for more clarity in the way the airlines charge their fees. Mavcom said airlines would be required to state clearly the fees and charges they impose on travellers, as currently “consumers are obliged to pay certain unavoidable and mandatory fees or charges” that they are not aware of.

The proposal is for airlines to display the airfares clearly, state the optional/ancillary services that the passenger opts for, and any fee charged or taxes imposed under any written law.

Fees such as administrative fees, processing fees and fuel surcharges have to be factored into the airfare.

“Airlines will be required to bring the top-five terms and conditions to the attention of passengers when they book their tickets.

“This includes the change or cancellation fee, no-show fee, whether the ticket has a refund value, baggage allowance and requirement for passengers to ensure they have the necessary travel documents,” the commission said.

The amendment includes flight cessations and cancellations.

The above report was taken from HERE.

Related

5 thoughts on “Thump Up To MAVCOM To Protect Travelers On Refund of PSC”

  1. Conning all the way says:
    March 19, 2018 at 6:53 pm

    What? Treating unclaimed PSC as revenue! kepala bapak Kau la AA.

    Reply
  2. No Ball Liow says:
    March 19, 2018 at 8:34 pm

    It is a very good idea that unclaimed PSC of no show passengers is treated as revenue of AirAsia. PSC of no show passenger belongs to the passenger not AirAsia.

    How could some airline charged between RM15 to RM300 as administrative charges for processing claim for PSC. MAVCOM must act now.

    MAVCOM must also explain what is it doing against what AAA and AAX have collected and treated as its revenue. The sum of RM6.5 million in the case of AA and about RM500K for AAX should be send to Unclaimed. Money Department. These sum cannot be treated as revenue. PSC was never part of the fare of AA. PSC is meant to pay to MAHB.

    The Minister of Finance and No Ball Liow should act on this unclaimed matter.

    Reply
  3. steven says:
    March 19, 2018 at 9:08 pm

    Congratulation MAVCOM. It is long overdue to regulate the unscrupulous tactics of the airline like what Shin Kok Leong had said: unclaimed PSC of no show passengers will be treated as revenue (if not claimed fore 6 months. When the money does not belong to AA, it does not matter after a lapse of whether 6 months or 1 or two years. The ownership of the PSC cannot change hands as what AA had done. What is the authority doing about this? Minister of Transport is useless. He is a good friend of Tony.

    Reply
  4. Low Caste Con Air says:
    March 20, 2018 at 1:59 pm

    How could unclaimed PSC is treated as revenue by AirAsia??? This must must be stopped by the authorities. This fella is playing around with our system. The authorities must act in this matter. What is the Registrar of Unclaimed Money doing? What are the Minister of Finance and Minister of Transport doing about this to protect the public? Unclaimed PSC remains unclaimed. It is not revenue for AirAsia. The no-show passenger had no business relationship with AA over the PSC. The passengers have relationship with MAHB only.

    Reply
  5. Joe says:
    March 20, 2018 at 6:56 pm

    Since MAVCOM has the evidence of some airline charging RM15 to RM300 as administrative fees, actions should be taken as soon as possible. This is very serious. The interest of travellers should be protected. The time has come for actions. It is an open secret that one airline has been known to have done this openly. AirAsia officer already said in court that unclaimed money after 6 months will be treated as revenue for AirAsia.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Old Blog Stats
5,037,921 hits

New Site Statistics
  • Total page views: 5,734

Recent Posts

  • Selamat Hari Raya Aidil Adha To All Muslims.
  • weechookeong.com is moving!
  • Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  • Happy Wesak Day To All Malaysians!
  • Now Everyone Can Provide Banking Services Without Digital Banking Licence!

Recent Comments

  1. Shahidan on Now Everyone Can Provide Banking Services Without Digital Banking Licence!
  2. John on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  3. Raman on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  4. izmee on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  5. Ragu on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!

Archives

  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008

Categories

  • Uncategorized
  • wangsa maju
  • wee choo keong

Site Admin

Log in
©2022 Wee Choo Keong | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com