Skip to content
Menu
Wee Choo Keong
  • Home
  • Discussion
  • Parliament
  • About Me
  • Complaints for DBKL
  • Festive Wishes
Wee Choo Keong

Questions Time: 05 April 2011 BNM: kerosakan wang kertas – kurang jelas dan luntur

Posted on April 5, 2011

Tuan Wee Choo Keong [Wangsa Maju] minta Menteri Kewangan menyatakan kerugian terperinci yang mana Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) terpaksa menanggung kerugian besar akibat kesalahan dalam pencetakan wang kertas Malaysia, yang menimbulkan masalah kekurangan wang kertas baru untuk Perayaan Tahun Baru Cina, serta memberi nama agensi atau syarikat yang dilantik untuk menguruskan kerja pencetakan wang oleh Thomas de la Rue di UK dan mengapakah BNM tidak menuntut pampasan dari syarikat yang dilantik.

Jawapan:

Tuan Yang di-Pertua,

Untuk makluman Yang Berhormat, kejadian dalam percetakan wang kertas adalah berpunca daripada percetakan yang kelihatan kurang jelas atau luntur sekiranya dibasuh menggunakan bahan cucian/peluntur yang berat. Namun, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) ingin memamklumkan bahawa ia tidak mengalami sebarang kerugian atau beban kewangan ekoran daripada masalah percetakan wang kertas tersebut. Ini kerana di bawah perjanjian pesanan yang ditanda tangani di antara BNM dan syarikat pencetak wang kertas berkenaan, syarikat tersebut bertanggungjawab ke atas segala kos, bayaran atau apa-apa tanggungan lain sekiranya berlaku sebarang masalah yang berpunca daripada kegagalan pihak syarikat tersebut dalam melaksanakan kontrak percetakan yang diberikan.

 

2. Berkaitan dengan kontrak pembekalan dan percetakan wang kertas, BNM hanya berurusan secara terus dengan syarikat-syarikat pencetak mata wang yang mempunyai reputasi yang tinggi serta memenuhi syarat-syarat ketat yang telah diluluskan oleh ahli lembaga pengarah BNM.  Antara syarat-syarat tersebut termasuklah mempunyai status kewangan yang kukuh, kepakarn, pengalaman, kualiti perkhidmatan, kapasiti dan keupayaan teknologi mencetak. Segala urusan seperti sebut harga, pembayaran dan urusan penghantaran adalah dibincangkan secara terus dengan syarikat-syarikat tersebut tanpa melalui broker atau agen.

 

3. BNM juga sentiasa memantau kedudukan bekalan wang kertas di dalam pasaran bagi memastikan bekalan wang kertas adalah memcukupi untuk keperluan orang ramai.  BNM juga turut mengambil maklum tentang permintaan yang tinggi ke atas wang kertas baru bagi kegunaan semasa musim-musim perayaan dan memastikan permintaatn tinggi ini dipenuhi dengan membekalkan stok wang kertas yang mencukupi.

Note:

It was strange that this case was never announced by BNM or reported in the press!

I have specifically asked for the name of company that was appointed by Bank Negara Malaysia to manage the printing of the paper currency. But the name of the company was purposely omitted except using the words “syarikat tersebut” with no reference to it in the any part of its reply.

Why BNM was so secretive about the name of the appointed company?  Is the appointed company indirectly or directly related to any of the BNM officers?

 

Related

2 thoughts on “Questions Time: 05 April 2011 BNM: kerosakan wang kertas – kurang jelas dan luntur”

  1. Poor Rakyat vs Bank Negara says:
    April 7, 2011 at 9:15 am

    05 April 2011 Sumbangan kepada warga emas oleh Poling Keong di Wangasa Maju = Great Photo

    PR vs BN in Sarawak = we nil on both sides , but consider Poor Rakyat vs Bank Negara , this is a very good question until there is a women keeping postpone = giving answer .

    http://www.manymany3m3.blogspot.com/

    Free Electricity < RM 20 = Thumbs up by Low Income Rakyat = But They Thumbs Down ( and Down again ) BNM …. 16th April 2011

    Reply
  2. Crooks in High Places says:
    April 9, 2011 at 10:56 am

    The crooks in high places is everywhre in government and GLCs now …. Chairman of S_, Bank N_ G___ ….
    Private healthcare is new focus area for Khazanah ….
    now a rakyat Msia just went to Pantai for medical follow up, usually the medician will cost him around RM800, now he have to pay RM1586!

    …. some opposition MP like to politicking ” does Khazanah know how to invest ” , then how to blame
    Khazanah invest in Healthcare which making profit ???? ……
    Consider one doctor serve 100 rakyat …. looks like the keutamaan is given to doctor rather than rakyat regardless either they are rich or poor ….. because the target is making a high-income doctor to level which more high income ….

    In this case , looks like the one fear is NOT the poor one , but is the medium income one . Why ? When someone move the steps from public hospital to private hospital , already ignore the poor one …. so what so big matter for them when move
    another steps from private hospital to medical tourism ….. ?
    In their eye , there is already NO hospital
    —————-

    More than 160 students were barred from entering their classrooms at an international school in Jalan Ampang on Monday because their parents had apparently failed to pay the school fees on time.

    http://www.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/1/5/nation/7734840&sec=nation

    The students – over 100 primary school pupils and 60 secondary school students – were “detained” at the library and the arts room , respectively, from 8am till lunchtime on the first day of school.

    We were only told that we would get a 20% discount if we pay before Nov 30,” she said. After paying the school fees of her children, aged 12 and 14, the parent was shocked when she was asked to pay an additional 20% as penalty for late payment.

    School fees for a student in the international school cost up to RM3,500 per semester.

    Parents expressed unhappiness over their children’s detention.

    Our opinion : Why the parents compaint ? Ins’t the rich one told the poor one , no money no education
    Oh yah now the more rich one tell the less rich one , no enough money , also no education

    Note: I had to delete a few letters to avoid unnecessary legal implications. My apology.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Old Blog Stats
5,037,921 hits

New Site Statistics
  • Total page views: 54,835

Recent Posts

  • Geeko 2.0 : A Troubling Reemergence Of An Insolvent BXC Travellers In MAHB?
  • Recap Geeko 1.0 & Emergence Of Geeko 2.0 (MAHB – BXC)
  • Temu Ramah dengan Sin Chew Daily pada 16.11.2022/Interview with Sin Chew Daily
  • Terima Kasih DBKL ambil tindakan segera!/Thank you DBKL!
  • Kenapa Warisan berdiri solo?

Recent Comments

  1. Nazmi on Geeko 2.0 : A Troubling Reemergence Of An Insolvent BXC Travellers In MAHB?
  2. Joshua on Geeko 2.0 : A Troubling Reemergence Of An Insolvent BXC Travellers In MAHB?
  3. The kong kali kong gang on Geeko 2.0 : A Troubling Reemergence Of An Insolvent BXC Travellers In MAHB?
  4. Siew Ka Wei: “Speedy Gonzales” Deal Tainted With Clear Conflict of Interest! Part – 1 – Wee Choo Keong on “Masa Sekarang Menunggu Mu” – Part 3 (Tourism Malaysia – Overseas Postings)
  5. Siew Ka Wei: “Speedy Gonzales” Deal Tainted With Clear Conflict of Interest! Part – 1 – Wee Choo Keong on Summary of Tourism Msia’s RM99.693 million “Speedy Gonzales” GEEKO Deal!

Archives

  • May 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008

Categories

  • Uncategorized
  • wangsa maju
  • wee choo keong

Site Admin

Log in
©2023 Wee Choo Keong | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com