Skip to content
Menu
Wee Choo Keong
  • Home
  • Discussion
  • Parliament
  • About Me
  • Complaints for DBKL
  • Festive Wishes
Wee Choo Keong

08 December 2010 Questions Time: On MACC/SPRM investigations

Posted on December 8, 2010

Pertanyaan:  Lisan

Daripada    :  Tuan Wee Choo Keong [Wangsa Maju]

Tarikh        :  08 Disember 2010

Soalan:

Tuan Wee Choo Keong [Wangsa Maju] minta Perdana Menteri menyatakan: –

(a)  jumlah kes di mahkamah yang dibawa oleh SPRM sejak 2008 hingga September 2010 dan berikan butiran kes-kes yang berjaya dan gagal; dan

(b)  apakah status sekarang dalam penyiasatan kes yang melibatkan En Hasbie Satar, bekas setiausaha Politik kepada bekas Menteri Kewang II, YB Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop?Jawapan:  YB Dato’ Seri Mohamed Nazri bin Abdul Aziz, Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri

(a)  Antara tahun 2008 hingga September 2010, sejumlah 547 kes telah dibawa di mahkamah. Dalam tempoh yang sama juga peratusan kes perbicaraan awal yang menang adalah 69 % sementara kes kalah adalah 31 %.  Manakala di peringkat rayuan pula, peratusan kes yang menang adalah 69 % kes yang kalah 31 %. Satistik keputusan kes perbicaraan awal dan peringkat rayuan seperti berikut:

Perbicaraan Awal Peringkat Rayuan

Tahun               Menang               Kalah             Tahun        Menang     Kalah

2008                     75                         25               2008             43                20

2009                     94                         52               2009            102                44

2010                   164                          75               2010             85                44

(Sehingga                                                            (Sehingga

September)                                                         September)

Jumlah                333                       152                                  240               108

(b)  Untuk makluman Yang Berhormat Wangsa Maju, siasatan Suruhajaya Pencegahan Rasuah (SPRM) ke atas kes yang dibangkitkan itu telah pun selesai dijalankan. Kertas siasatan kini dalam kajian Timbalan Pendakwa Raya.

Sekian, terima kasih

Nota:

Banyak bulan telah berlepas dan jawapan masih yang sama:  “… dalam kajian Timbalan Pendakwa Raya”.  Soalan utama adalah kenapakah Pejabat Peguam Negara menggunakan masa yang amat panjang untuk mengaji kes-kes yang high profil. Saya akan membangkitkan soalan utama ini di Parlimen kerana keputusan untuk menuduh adalah di tangan Peguam Negara dan bukan SPRM. SPRM menyiasat sahaja.

Related

10 thoughts on “08 December 2010 Questions Time: On MACC/SPRM investigations”

  1. Seong says:
    December 9, 2010 at 7:11 pm

    The AG is sleeping all the time that’s why the cases have been delayed. MACC sent up to AG Chambers to be caught with spider webs! The government should amend the MACC law to empower the MACC to prosecute instead of leaving it to the inefficient AG!

    Reply
  2. antikatak says:
    December 10, 2010 at 2:19 am

    sudah lah wee..u r just a katak..nobody give a fucking shit what u r saying..u r just delusional..time 2 c a shrink

    Reply
  3. frustrated says:
    December 10, 2010 at 7:39 pm

    I am not surprised that the languages used by the blind supporter of PR. When they cannot win based on issue then they would want to win by their foul languages. This is their style.

    Politiking is what they are good at. No thoughts for the nation. Keep up the good works YB and carry on to do what you are doing. Screw them why you see the wrong doings. You have our supports.

    Reply
  4. Mun Sang says:
    December 10, 2010 at 10:27 pm

    Thank you for speaking up us. At least you and your friends are not involved in the dirty tricks in the PKR party elections recently. All the dirty election tricks can be found in the PKR party elections.

    You are also right when you talk about cronyism in the DAP especially in Selangor where a lot of projects has been to Mr Lee Why Wing, the uncle of Lee Kee Hiong, the Kajang councilor.

    YB I hope that the MACC will also look into this matter.

    Reply
  5. To:Antikatak says:
    December 11, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    Here got one bad news for you in Yahoo

    The Unspinners: Tan Boon Wah tak jawab banyak soalan di Inkues
    What is Ean Yong Hian Wah secret ? Section 03a . Who is pH and IQuit in MP Serdang Teo Nie Ching blog ? Section 03b . What is Kajang councillor Tan Boon Wah secret ?
    theunspinners.blogspot.com/2010/07/tan-​boon-wah-tak… – Cached

    Thanks for YB Wee and another one blogger Unspinners
    who trust us ,

    http://theunspinners.blogspot.com/2010/07/tan-boon-wah-tak-jawab-banyak-soalan-di.html

    Reply
  6. For the Antikatak says:
    December 11, 2010 at 8:35 pm

    Please look at the PR, the posers. sand mining scandals in Selangor, all the posers, Anuar Ibrahim, Lim Kit Siang and Hadi all are quiet up to now. Lim Kit Siang the super Royal Commission hero is keeping quiet on the support letter scandals in Selangor.
    Now his ex political secretary Lee Kee Hiong was knocked out from Selangor DAP but co-opted into the committee.

    Lim Kit Siang is also very quiet over the Mummy Foo’s scandal. So please stop throwing stones when living in glass houses.

    Reply
  7. Posers says:
    December 12, 2010 at 7:34 pm

    Lim Kit Siang and Anuar Ibrahim should tell us all about the reforms. Let us starts with the sand mining scandals in Selangor and the Ronnie Liu support letters scandals.

    WHy both of them are in total silence about it. Instead trying to fool the people with “Ketuanan Melayu”. Ketuanan Melayu is all about the Sultanate and the symbol representing the country like Agung. Anuar and Lim Kit Siang should stop to fool the Malaysians with the Ketuanan Melayu’s distractions.

    Reply
  8. For The Anti Katak says:
    December 12, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    Even Singapore government have said that Anwar have a homosexual relationship with Saifu: according to Wikileaks. Lets wait and see what are the reactions from Lim Kit Siang and Hadi. The better come out quickly to defend their Prime Minister to be otherwise this information will put paid to the trip to Putrajaya.

    Reply
  9. Ala DAP says:
    December 13, 2010 at 11:25 am

    Apa itu Mummy Foo? Lim Kit Siang tak jawab? kena ada Royal Commission untuk menyiasat.

    Reply
  10. hazou says:
    December 16, 2010 at 5:24 pm

    good job Mr Wee,

    Hopeless blind PR supporter. Can’t differentiate the truth. haha even RPK now is condemning them. Serve them right for trusting that ‘Gift From God’ my a**

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • weechookeong.com is moving!
  • Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  • Happy Wesak Day To All Malaysians!
  • Now Everyone Can Provide Banking Services Without Digital Banking Licence!
  • Will The Shining Star Of Ambitious But Incompetent Zafrul Shine After GE15?

Recent Comments

  1. Shahidan on Now Everyone Can Provide Banking Services Without Digital Banking Licence!
  2. John on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  3. Raman on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  4. izmee on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  5. Ragu on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
Site Statistics
  • Today's page views: : 17
  • Total page views: 17

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008

Categories

  • Uncategorized
  • wangsa maju
  • wee choo keong
©2022 Wee Choo Keong | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com