Skip to content
Menu
Wee Choo Keong
  • Home
  • Discussion
  • Parliament
  • About Me
  • Complaints for DBKL
  • Festive Wishes
Wee Choo Keong

Sime Darby paid RM40 millions or only RM4 millions to DBKL for the royalty payment for the Bukit Kiara Land?

Posted on November 28, 2010

(To be updated later)

How about Kuala Lumpur Golf and Country Club (KLGCC) which was occupying a piece of land in Bukit Kiara of about 60 acres which belonging to DBKL for many years?  The said piece of  land has been used by KLGCC for free for many years and it was was only been paid for by Sime Darby recently for a about RM400 to RM500 millions. Sime Darby had to also pay to DBKL another RM40 millions as some form of royalty payment.  I am informed that the actual sum paid to DBKL was only RM4 millions. DBKL gave a “special discount” of RM36 millions! Why?

Background:

In the 1990s when I was the then Bukit Bintang MP,   I was very much involved in exposing the sale of the Bukit Kiara land to Lum Chang from Singapore for a song.  The said land comprising of a few hundred acres was sold to Lum Chang at about RM53,000 per acre for a 99 years lease. Lum Chang was given approval to build a golf course, which is now known as KLGCC, with an approval for building of 450 units of condo! This was the “Cheap sale of prime land of the century”.  I brought this scandal to Parliament. The lease was finally reduced to 66 years and the approval for the building of condos was withdrawn.  After that Lum Chang gave up and Sime Darby came it as a white knight and saved the prime land in Bukit Kiara. So KLGCC is now under Malaysian control. These are the little bit of background about KLGCC.

The issues now for DBKL and Ministry of Wilayah Persekutuan are:

1.  Why was Sime Darby allowed to use the 60 acres of land in Bukit Kiara for free for so many years?

2.  Why did DBKL gave a RM36 millions discount on the royalty payment?

3.  Did Sime Darby pay RM40 millions or RM4 millions only as royalty to DBKL? (May be this was one of the reasons why Sime Darby cannot make the special audit report public!

4.  Who was the special “negotiator” for this special discount?

5.  Who is this man, Datuk Azeeeeeeeee  … z?

The Minister of Wilayah Persekutuan and Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur must provide answers to the above questions.

Related

10 thoughts on “Sime Darby paid RM40 millions or only RM4 millions to DBKL for the royalty payment for the Bukit Kiara Land?”

  1. Azeeez says:
    November 29, 2010 at 2:02 am

    Sime Darby must have paid Rm40 million! How come Dbkl received only RM4 millions? Special discount of RM36 million must have gone somewhere. where? Where? Where? May be Raja nong Chik can tell us where.

    Reply
  2. Parameswara says:
    November 29, 2010 at 1:22 pm

    So what lah?
    Other people, like you, must be anti-Pakatan and BN friendly – despite all these type of nonsese continuing.
    Right?

    And your role is to stir up such issues on ‘hangat-hangat tahi ayam’ basis to show (or fool) the rakyat that you are a responsible wakil rakyat.

    Enough lah Mr Wee.

    You cannot touch or shake-up anyone in the Federal establishment.

    They can buy you over any time, many times.

    Reply
  3. Pakatan Rouge says:
    November 30, 2010 at 12:19 am

    Please look at the bloody mess created by the “God Sent Leader” (acording to Wan Azizah). The God Sent Leader cannot even look after his own Party and Pakatan, you hope to look after the country. The country will be also a bloody mess if the God Sent Leader did every thing to cheat in the elections like what they did in the PKR.

    No one would ever want to be associated with all the frauds that have been highlighted by Zaid Ibrahim, Chegu Bard and others and the God Sent Leader did nothing to put them right.

    Only idiot will vote for such fraudulent Group known as Pakatan.

    Reply
  4. saloma says:
    November 30, 2010 at 1:25 am

    Good work! vat ever happened to the Astro affair????? Re-runs, dish scandal.

    why do malaysians hv to pay when 200 days it rains here and services gets interrupted.

    As an MP, as long as you bring out issues that concerns the people thats all that matters, Independent or PR.

    Reply
  5. ParaBodoh says:
    November 30, 2010 at 1:44 am

    The late Teng Sioa Ping of China has said: It does not matter whether the cat is black or white in colour, as long as it could catch rats, it is a good cat.”

    I cannot believe that people can just follow blindly to support those leaders with the attitude of “saying one thing and do another”. Just look at the elections process of the DAP that practices democracy ala Lim Dynasty. Highest votes have no significant post and lower votes becomes leader by virtue of being a crony.

    Before they are in power they are already showing their true colours.

    That is the democracy that stupid people longing for. If that’s is what they wanted they can have it.

    Reply
  6. The Palace Monk says:
    November 30, 2010 at 10:49 am

    The entire Kiara area was originally planned for a Botanical Gardens. If my memory serves me right, the architect Raglan Squire dan Rakan2 was appointed for the job. How did a planned Botanical Garden got “hijacked”?

    Reply
  7. Lim says:
    November 30, 2010 at 11:47 am

    PR is for family members only. The leaders are only interested in promoting family and cronies. THey are only interested in politicking and nothing else. They will fabricate evidence to suit their ego trip to Putrajaya.

    Raja Nong Chik must explain why DBKL gave a whooping discount of RM36 million. Who gave the instructions? I am sure that Datuk Bandar and DBKL officers dare not do such a thing.

    I hope that MACC will move in to investigate this scandal in the Kementerian Wilayah. Raja Nong Chik must take responsibility.

    Reply
  8. Rosli says:
    November 30, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    Raja Nong Chik should know well who is Datuk Azeez the negotiator. The issue is why DBKL gave the Rm36 millions discount? Was it because of the intervention of Datuk Azeez, the famous negotiator for Sime Darby?

    Raja Nong Chik must explain whether he was aware the reason for the RM36 millions!

    Raja Nong Chik please stop pretending or playing ignorance. We all know what was this case all about.

    YB please press for answers and get the MACC to move in.

    Reply
  9. anuar says:
    November 30, 2010 at 1:27 pm

    Satu projek lagi untuk Datuk Azeez! Raja Nong Chik jagan pura-pura. kami di DBKL sudah tahu mengenai diskaun RM36 juta diberikan kepada Sime.

    MACC perlu chek skandal ini.

    Reply
  10. az_man_n@yahoo.com says:
    December 1, 2010 at 6:27 pm

    YB,jika cerita pasal kes tipu tanah..jangan lupa kes tanah rezab melayu..yg tlelah semakin kurang..

    Reply

Leave a Reply to saloma Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Old Blog Stats
5,037,921 hits

New Site Statistics
  • Total page views: 6,542

Recent Posts

  • Selamat Hari Raya Aidil Adha To All Muslims.
  • weechookeong.com is moving!
  • Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  • Happy Wesak Day To All Malaysians!
  • Now Everyone Can Provide Banking Services Without Digital Banking Licence!

Recent Comments

  1. Shahidan on Now Everyone Can Provide Banking Services Without Digital Banking Licence!
  2. John on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  3. Raman on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  4. izmee on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  5. Ragu on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!

Archives

  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008

Categories

  • Uncategorized
  • wangsa maju
  • wee choo keong

Site Admin

Log in
©2022 Wee Choo Keong | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com