Skip to content
Menu
Wee Choo Keong
  • Home
  • Discussion
  • Parliament
  • About Me
  • Complaints for DBKL
  • Festive Wishes
Wee Choo Keong

Parliamentary Questions Time 17 November 2009

Posted on November 17, 2009

YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [WANGSA MAJU] minta Menteri Wilayah Persekutuan menyataka apakah kesan sampingan mengenai menara dan cakera alt telekomunikasi dan tindakan yang akan diambil oleh pihak DBKL terhadap alat tersebut yang banyak dipasang di rumah kedai bertingkat dua di seluruh kawasan Kuala Lumpur memandangkan bahawa garis panduan pihak DBKL memang melarang pemasangan alat dan menara ini di rumah kedai bertingkat dua dan ke bawah?

YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [WANGSA MAJU] ask the Federal Territory Minister to state the side effects of the telco towers and dishes and what are the actions to be taken by DBKL against the numerous apparatus installed on those double story shop houses all over Kuala Lumpur bearing in mind the DBKL’s own guidelines, which prohibits the installation of such apparatus on the double or single storey shop houses?

Jawapan Menteri:

Tuan Yang di-Pertua,

Unyuk makluman Ahli Yang Berhormat bagi Wangsa Maju, kemudahab peralatan dan teknologi komunikasi merupakan satu keperluan pada masa kini. Tuntutan penggunan untuk mendapatkan perkhidmatan telekomunikasi yang lebih baik turut mempengaruhi pemasangan bilangan menara telekomunikasi. Menara telekomunikasi secara amnya digunakan untuk menghatar dan menerima isyarat gelombang mikro, siaran radio dan televisyen, radar dan juga peralatan tanpa wayar atau kabel.

Dalam hal ini, peralatan cakera dan komunikasi adalah tergolong di dalam kumpulan peralatan yang mengeluarkan radio frequency dari jenis radiasi tidak mengion atau non-ionising radiation. Kajian mendapati, radiasi inin adalah selamat dan tidak memberikan implikasi negative kepada kesihatan yakni tidak menyebabkan kanser.

Kawalan dan pemantauan yang dijalankan oelh Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL) kepada pemasangan menara dan cakera peralatan komunikasi ini adalah lebih kepada aspek kawalan pemandangan estetika.  Garis panduan larangan pamasangan peralatan dan menara telekomunikasi di bangunan 2 tingkat yang disediakan oleh DBKL mengambil kira tmabahan struktur fizikal, pemasangan peralatan dan menara yang jelas serta pemandangan awam dari paras jalan.

Walau bagaimanpun, memandangkan struktur pemasangan alat dan menara ini merupakan satu keperluan penting dalam kemajuan ekonomi Negara, maka garis panduan pembinaannya telah diberikan sedikit kelonggaran.  Justeru, DBKL membenarkan untuk mana-mana bangunan 2 tingkat, yang disekitarnya turut terdapat bangunan-bangunan yang sama tinggi, untuk memasang peralatan cakera dan menara telekomunikasi.  DBKL juga telah menetapkan syarat supaya peralatan ini diletakkan di arah belakang bangunan dan bukan di hadapan bangunan. Dismaping itu, pemasangan juga perlu diperakukan sebagai ‘selamat’ oleh justeru berdaftar.

Related

4 thoughts on “Parliamentary Questions Time 17 November 2009”

  1. Lim says:
    November 18, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    I have been informed a few month ago that DBKL was supposed to take actions to remove those illegal telco dishes. But DBKL didn’t proceed with the actions.

    Now we get this reply that telco dishes are safe. I have read reports that telco dishes are health hazard. I hope that DBKL/ministry will seriously look into the health hazard aspect of the telco dishes that are located right above or next to residential houses.

    We do not want to be victims of sickness.

    Reply
  2. Leon says:
    November 18, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    Telco dishes on top of double storey shoplots are bad for health. DBKL should ban such dishes on double storey.

    Reply
  3. lee wee tak says:
    November 18, 2009 at 10:05 pm

    wah the person who lodge a complain in Setapak Indah must be pissed.

    she went to YB Wee and also Lok Kau and see how caring the BN administration are?

    In Singapore, you can’t see any antenna. DBKL should ask them how they do it.

    If the Menteri is so sure, why don’t he pasang one on top of his mansion directly over his bedroom?

    Oh no, Mahathir won’t like it when Malaysia learn from Singapore…..

    Reply
  4. lee wee tak says:
    November 18, 2009 at 10:09 pm

    “telah menetapkan syarat supaya peralatan ini diletakkan di arah belakang bangunan dan bukan di hadapan bangunan”

    stoooooopid statement.

    pasang depan pasang belakang is only addressing “appearance”

    the distance from penghuni is the important factor.

    the other thing to do is for residents so affecting to boycott the shoplots that allow their shops to pasang these cakera telco

    and another rule DBKL must put in is that if the shop owners want to make money by allowing their place to host a telco tower, they must sleep in the same premises

    Mr Mah TC, may you rest in peace and I weep for you

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Old Blog Stats
5,037,921 hits

New Site Statistics
  • Total page views: 257

Recent Posts

  • weechookeong.com is moving!
  • Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  • Happy Wesak Day To All Malaysians!
  • Now Everyone Can Provide Banking Services Without Digital Banking Licence!
  • Will The Shining Star Of Ambitious But Incompetent Zafrul Shine After GE15?

Recent Comments

  1. Shahidan on Now Everyone Can Provide Banking Services Without Digital Banking Licence!
  2. John on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  3. Raman on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  4. izmee on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!
  5. Ragu on Syed Zaid Albar Left SC In Disgrace – Good Riddance To BAD RUBBISH!

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008

Categories

  • Uncategorized
  • wangsa maju
  • wee choo keong
©2022 Wee Choo Keong | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com